Leaves Of Gold

A Call To Return To The Teaching Of The Bible

A ministry of Evangelist James A. Nelson   jan23@cox.net

Year III, No. 12                         DECEMBER                                                                    2009

 

Master Outlines Number Forty-seven, taken from "The Christian Life Bible", Thomas Nelson Publishers, with notes by Porter L. Barrington

Seven Parables of the Kingdom of Heaven

The kingdom of heaven is God's rule during this present age and after. The expression, "kingdom of heaven;' used over and over by Matthew, comes by implication from Daniel where the messianic "Son of Man" came in "the clouds of heaven" to God the Father, "Then to Him was given ... a king­dom" (Dan. 7:13, 14). A basic theme of the kingdom of heaven parables involves a king Kiving a marriage feast or taking a journey, followed by a long period in which some come to the marriage feast or work diligently for the king; then comes the king's surprise return, his reward of the faithful, and his punishment of the wicked. Thus these parables show how Christ will administer the church and the world during this present age, and how He will judge all upon His return.

A New Testament parable is an earthly story that parallels a scriptural truth. Why did Christ teach in parables? He explained part of the answer in Matthew 13:10-17. Parables vividly com­municated from the known (earthly) to the unknown-unseen (spiritual), and providentially discrimi­nated among the hearers. Those whose ears had been opened by God would understand (Matt. 13:9) and be blessed (Matt. 13:16, 17), while the unsaved and uninterested would hear but not comprehend (Matt. 13:13-15; cf. 1 Cor. 2:14). Today these parables slill help our understanding of what is going on in the world, what God is accomplishing, how He is working, how different segments of mankind will react to the gospel message during our age, and what God will do when Christ returns to set up His earthly kingdom. Each one is a rare beauty capahie of unending study and admiration.

47-A. The SowerMatthew 13:3-9, 18-23)-

This parable is easy to understand, because the Lord Jesus interpreted it for His apostles (vv. 18-23):

(1) The sower is one who sows the Word of the kingdom in the world.

(2) The seed is the gospel of Jesus Christ (1 Cor. 15:1-4; cf. John 3:17, 18,).

(3) The ground onto which the gospel seed is sown is the heart of man (Rom. 10:9, 10).

There are four different responses to the gospel message-four different types of groL!f\d upon which the seed of the gospel falls. Christ did not teach that all the world would be converted during this age (Matt. 7:21-23). The various reactions are not caused by different qualities of seed-for example, more thrilling or compelling preaching. Christ placed the responsibility for faith or unbelief on the soil-the hearer.

(1) The first response comes from a hard heartjy, v. 4, cf John 12:37-41; Heb. 3:7-13). Wayside soil is hard and unprepared for seed. The fowls that devour the seed that fell on the hard ground are Satan and his demons.

(2) The second response comes from a shallow heart (vv. 5, 6). Such a person has no spiritual depth, no commitment to God's Word. He holds to his religious decision for a while; but when tribulation or persecution come, "because of the word" of God, he is offended and falls away from his profession of faith (vv. 20, 21; cf. Matt. 7:21-23).       .

(3) The third response comes from a worldly heart (v. 7). A heart that loves this world system is a heart alienated from God (1 Cor. 3:1-4). The love of money, success, and the pleasures of this world choke out the influence of the Word of God in the life of the professing believer so that he becomes unfruitful (v. 22). Many profess Christ but love the world and the things of the world more than they love God (1 John 2:15-17).

(4) The fourth response comes from an understanding heart (vv. 8, 23). Note that only one man understood the Word of God, and brought forth fruit (Acts 8:26-39).

The parable of the sower will apply to the ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ until the harvest at the end of the present age (John 4:35-39). This parable should warn unconverted people that they need to receive the "good seed," the message of Christ's forgiveness, into their hearts. It also should encourage Christians to witness boldly, because the seed does produce fruit. However, the parable also puts to rest the unbiblical expectation that everyone who "hears" will enter the kingdom. Only those who hear, understand, and believe will make the true entrance.

 

See Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43, for Point 47-B: The Tares.

               As He did with the parable of the sower, our Lord interpreted this parable for us:

(1) The sower of the good seed is the Son of Man, the Lord Jesus Christ (vv. 24, 37).

(2) The field is the world (vv. 24, 38). While here on earth He sowed the good seed in person; but before ascending into heaven, He commissioned His church to proclaim the gospel to every person in every nation (Matt. 28:19, 20).

(3) The good seed in this parable is not the gospel, but rather the children of the kingdom (vv. 24, 38). He began to sow (scatter) the good seed (the children of God) first in Jerusalem, then in Judea and Samaria; and He continues to scatter His children among all parts of the world. The good seed, as they are sown, are to share their faith with that part of the world in which they have been scattered (Acts 1 :8; cf 8:1-4).               .

(4) "The tares are the sons of the wicked one," Satan (vv. 25, 38). Jesus said to the unsaved religious leaders of His day, "You are of your father the devil" (John 8:44). Where Jesus sends His children, Satan also sends his. You will find in most churches children of God and children of the Devil (Matt. 7:21-23,).

(5) The enemy that sowed the tares is the Devil (vv. 28, 39).

(6) The harvest is the end of the age (vv. 30, 39). Christ's second coming will conclude this age. He will send His angels to reap the harvest and separate the wheat from the tares. He will rapture the "wheat," the children of the kingdom, and burn the "tares," the children of Satan. Note the contrast: The children of the Devil will be cast into "the furnace of fire" (hell), while the children of God "will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father" (vv. 30, 40-43; cf. Rev. 20:15).

 

47-C. The Mustard Seed (Matthew 13:31, 32)-"The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and sowed in his field" (v. 31). The mustard seed is one of the smallest of seeds.

(1) The mustard seed is the church in its numerically insignificant beginning-Christ and the twelve

apostles. On the Day of Pentecost, the small kingdom began its phenomenal expansion. Like the mustard tree it continued to grow, branching out into other nations of the known world.

(2) The man who sowed the seed is the God-Man, Christ Jesus.

(3) His field is the world.

(4) The fowls of the air that lodged in the branches are probably the same as in the parable of the sower-Satan and his demons (Matt. 13:4, 19,            

This mustard tree (the church), in its early existence, was pure and powerful until Satan's followers found a way to nest in its branches. Christendom will continue with the true children of God, as well as the imposters who profess to be God's children. Just as the wheat and the tares will grow together until the harvest, so the saved and the unsaved will nest in the mustard tree until Jesus comes to separate the wheat from the tares, the sheep from the goats, the saved from the unsaved (Matt. 25:31-34,41,46).

47-D. The leaven (Matthew 13:33)-

(1) The woman is the harlot church (Rev. 17).

(2) The leaven represents the subtle working of evil, for which the same symbol is used elsewhere in Scripture (e.g., Ex. 12:15, 19; Matt. 16:6-12,). It is religious hypocrisy (Luke 12:1). The leaven is the evil doctrine of the apostate church.

(3) The three measures of meal represent Christendom from its inception through the Tribulation. After the true church is raptured, Christendom will be totally corrupt (1 Cor. 5:6-9). The "mystery of lawlessness" (2 Thess. 2:7) has been working as leaven in the church from its early days (Rev. 2:2-15) and will continue to work until the whole of Christendom is evil.

This parable teaches that as the years and centuries roll on, the. pure Christianity of the early church will become progressively corrupt until the entire lump (Christendom) is leavened.

.

47-E. The Hidden Treasure (Matthew 13:44)- This profound parable is one of the deepest and most misinterpreted of all the parables. It involves both revelation and mystery (Rom. 16:25, 26; cf. Mark 4:11, 12

(Point 47-£ continued from previous page)

(1) The revelation is that the hidden treasure is the kingdom of God, not specifically the church, althou/lh the church is part of God's kingdom. This parable deals with the total kingdom, and not merely with a parI. (2) The mystery is that when the lord Jesus found the treasure in the field, He hid it. The kingdom of , God in its totality is still a mystery, hidden from man. However, Christ has revealed to us the King" manifesto, found in the Sermon on the Mount.

(3) The treasure is hidden in the field (the world). When Adam and Eve sinned and were driven from thl' Garden of Eden and God put a curse upon the world (Gen. 3:4-19, page 5), Satan, the god of this agl', attempted to usurp a kingdom (2 Cor. 4:4, page 1167). Satan's kingdom, the kingdom of evil, is sel'n everywhere. The treasure, the kingdom of God that is hidden in the world, will be revealed in all pOWl'r when the King returns and establishes His kingdom.

Jesus journeyed to Calvary with the promise of joy before Him (Heb. 12:2, page 1250). It was the joy of knowing that on the other side of the Cross was His purchased kingdom. After His resurrection He wenl back to heaven to await the Father's time, when He will return to this earth as King of kings and lord of lords to claim the kingdom (Matt. 25:31-46, page 976; d. Rev. 19:16, page 1313).

See Matthew 13:45, 46, above, for Point 47-F: The Pearl of Great Price.

47-F. The Pearl of Great Price (Matthew 13:45, 46)-The "pearl of great price" (v. 46) is perhaps the easiest to understand of all of Jesus' parables.

Again we have the merchant, representing the God-Man, Christ Jesus, who came into the world "to seek and to save that which was lost" (luke 19:10, page 1038). The merchant came seeking beautiful pearls, and found one pearl of exquisite beauty. This speaks of the church, the body of Christ (Col. 1:18, page 1202). It is a beautiful picture of the growth, unity, and purity of the church.

The seeking Savior comes, and men, women, and children hear the gospel of how He was pierced, "wounded for our transgressions" (Is. 53:5, page 693). A pearl is formed in an oyster-a grain of sand lodged in the oyster's shell causes irritation, triggering a secretion that surrounds the sand ... and in time a pearl is formed. Similarly, through the centuries the lord has been adding to the church those who are being saved (Acts 2:47, page 1090). Thus, all born-again children of God together are valuable pearls in the eyes of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, because we were spiritually shaped by the blood that came from the Savior's pierced side.

This is a great mystery: that billions of individuals, living and dead, of differing backgrounds, cultures, customs, and languages, are one body. Tragically, sometimes differences in doctrine, opinion, and will are so pronounced between believers that it seems there will never be unity among them. Many refuse to "speak the same thing" and "be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment" (1 Cor. 1:10, page 1148). Nonetheless they are all one in "the unity of the Spirit," in "one body" (Eph. 4:3, 4, page 1190). And just as the merchant sold all that he had and bought the one pearl of great price, so "Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her" (Eph. 5:25, page 1192).

This pure, pearl-like unity of the church may never be visible on this earth, during this age. It will be realized, though, when the dead in Christ are raised and, with those who are alive, are caught up to meet Him in the air (1 Thess. 4:16-18, page 1212). Then we will be perfect in body and mind-"conformed to His glorious body" (Phil. 3:21, page 1198) and knowing "just as [we] also [are] known" (1 Cor. 13:12, page 1160). Then we shall be revealed as one body, one bride, or, as in the parable, "one pearl of great price"-paid for by His death, burial, and resurrection.

See Matthew 13:47-50, above, for Point 47-G: The Net.

47-G. The Net (Matthew 13:47-50)- This parable depicts the consummation of what the foregoing parables describe, as the kingdom moves from mystery to open, visible presence.

(1) The kingdom of heaven is a net filled with fish-a catch of all kinds.

(2) The sea is the nations of the world who will come before the King to be judged.

(3) The catch is made up of good and bad. Just as the King allows the tares to grow amid the wheat until He comes to establi~h His kingdom, so the good and bad fish will co-exist until the Master Fisherman casts His net and draws them into His presence at the end of the age (v. 49). The angels will then separate the good from the bad (Matt. 25:31-46). The good (the saved, who did the will of God-John 6:40) will be received into God's kingdom. The bad (the lost, who were disobedient) will be "cast ... into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth" (v. 50).

These studies will continue..............

 

Baptist Doctrine, E. C. Gillentine, Bogard Press

1. 

CHAPTER TEN

The Necessity of the Virgin Birth  Dr. 1. R. Dean, Toronto, Canada

This timely address was given by Dr. Dean before the Premillennial Association of Southern California,­an organization with which is affiliated over one hun­dred and fifty (150) evangelical ministers in South­ern California. We are glad to pass it on to our read­ers, furnishing, as it does, unanswerable arguments for the Virgin Birth of our Lord Jesus Christ.

                      Uios                                                 Sperma

The Virgin Birth of Christ was a necessity, for three reasons; first, to fulfill prophecy; second, to give  a title to the throne of David; and third, that He might be a Saviour.

1. TO FULFILL PROPHECY.

Look at the two Greek words above. The word at the left is pronounced "whyos" and is translated "son." The word at the right is translated "seed." The whole story of Christ's meeting all the demands of prophecy and escaping all the bars of prophecy and thus secur­ing an unmistakable title to the throne of David is told in the discriminating use of these two words. It would be absolutely impossible for Him to claim a title to that throne if He had not been born of a virgin. Now Uios (son) may express natural, blood relation­ship, and is often used in this sense. But it may ex­press merely legal relationship, when there is no kin­ship by blood at all. This usage is, common in all lan­guages. Saul called David "my son" because David was married to Saul's daughter, I Sam. 24:16. One may be a legal son, or son-in-law, without being a real son by blood.

On the other hand, Sperm a (seed) always expresses blood relationship, and never merely legal relationship.

Many homes in this land have sons that are in no wise related by blood to their foster parents.

This word Sperma (seed) is used in a prophecy about Christ. He has the unique distinction of being the only person born in the human race who was "the seed of a woman."

It is evident that if Christ were the seed of David and at the same time born of a virgin, He mu'st have gotten this relationship through His mother, sirice He had not human father. This difficulty is met in the very promise about the Messiah.

"The Lord God said unto the serpent, And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed. It shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel," Gen. 3:15.

This prophecy has always been interpreted to refer to Christ, who would in the end overcome Satan and set up His Kingdom on this earth.

If it were not for this prophecy it would be impos­sible for us to claim that Christ was the seed of Da­vid, and at the same time born of a virgin, without a human father, But, according to this promise, there was to be one unique person that was to be the seed of a woman. This He could not be if He were the natural seed of Joseph. He would then be the seed of a man.

Christ was the only person ever born that could fulfill this prophecy. The virgin Mary was a direct descendant by blood from David; therefore to be the seed of this woman was to be the seed of David.

This harmonizes with the great prophecy of Isaiah. "Behold a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel," Isaiah 7:14.

This prophecy, according to Matthew, was fulfilled at the birth of Jesus Christ, Matt. 1:22. He is Im­manuel, which means God with us. So both His Deity and humanity are declared in this prophecy.

He must be born of a virgin, then, to fulfill these two great prophecies. But it is equally necessary for Him to be born of a virgin to escape the bar raised by Jeremiah.

II. HE MUST BE BORN OFA VIRGIN THAT HE MAY BE ENTITLED TO THE THRONE OF DAVID.

Against Jeconiah (the last King in the royal succes­sion that ever sat on the Throne of David), Jeremiah pronounced these words:

"Is this man Coniah a despised, broken idol? Is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? Wherefore are they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not? 0 earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days; for none of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah," Jer. 22:28-30.

This does not mean that J econiah would not have children, for we are distinctly told that he did havil

 children, I Chron. 3:17; Matt. 1:2. But it means that none of his descendants would ever sit on the throne of David.

Now Matthew's genealogy shows that the title to the throne of David must descend through this very line of Jeconiah and no other. Christ, then, must es­tablish His legal right through this line, or He could have no right to that throne.

He must be the Vios (son) of David through this male line of succession, but He must not be the Sperma (seed) of Jeconiah. Remember the title to the throne of David always descends through the father, not the mother.

The genealogy was preserved with the greatest care, although the legal heirs were barred by Jeremiah's prophecy.

Thus Matthew says, "After they were brought to Babylon, Jeconiah begat Salathiel, and Salathiel begat Zerubbabel, and Zerubbabel begat Abiud," etc. This genealogy goes right on to Jacob who begat Joseph. Each one of these princes were legally entitled to the throne because they were the natural descendants of King Jeconiah. They were both the Dios (son) and Sperma (seed) of this despised king. It must be re­membered that each of these words are used of de­scendants, however remote.

Notice the peculiar wording of Matt. 1:16: "Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ." Then follows the e~plana­tion how Jesus was begotten of the Holy Ghost 'before the marriage of His mother, and how His mother was married by divine direction before His birth. This made Him the Dios (son) of Joseph, without being the Sperma (seed) of Joseph, and therefore the seed of Jeconiah. Joseph was the only living heir to the throne of David when Christ was born. There are never two proper heirs to the throne at the same time. Luke says of Joseph, "He was of the house and line­age of David," Luke 2:4. This means that Joseph was heir to the throne, notwithstanding he was barred from reigning by Jeremiah's prophecy.

It was only by Christ being born of a virgin that He would get over the bar set up by Jeremiah.

If He were the natural seed of Joseph, He could not be the seed of a woman, Gen. 3:15. If He were the natural seed of Joseph, He would not have been born of a virgin, according to the promise of Isaiah 7:14. If He were the seed of Joseph, "He would then also be the seed of J econiah and could not rule in Judah, sitting on the throne of David. Admit His virgin birth and everything is simple, Deny His virgin birth and all is confusion and contradiction.

III. THE PROBLEM OF THE TWO GENEALOGIES.

In perfect harmony with this plan Matthew begins with these words:

"The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son (Uios) of David, the son (Uios) of Abraham."

Is it not strange that Matthew never let his pen slip once and called Him the seed (Sperma) of David or Abraham, but always the son (Uios) of David and Abraham?

Matthew gives the genealogy of Joseph. He says, "Jacob begat Joseph." He could have only one father that begat him. Luke says, "Joseph was the son of Heli," Luke 3:23. But this may mean, and certainly does mean here, that he was only the son-in-law. Since he was married to Mary he had a father-in-law, Le., Mary's father, whose name was HelL

This solves the problem of these two genealogies. Luke establishes His descent from David through Nathan which is not the line of succession at all. But still this makes Him the seed of David in His human­ity as was promised, Psalm 89:36. In Matthew, the wise men ask the question, "Where is he that is born King of the Jews?" Matt. 2:2. Christ was the only person that was ever born a King. Joseph was still living when He was born, but, as we have seen, he could not occupy the throne. But Christ had every right and no bar, so He was· born a king. Nathanael was right when he said, ",Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel," John 1:49.

Be assured that He could not be the King of Israel if He were not the Son of God, born of a virgin. When Pilate asked Him, "Art thou the King of the Jews?" Luke 23:3, He answered, "Thou sayest it."

Since Luke gives His genealogy from Mary declar­ing His humanity, we would expect His introduction to be different, and so it is.

"And 10, the angel said unto them. Fear not; for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord," Luke 2:10, 11.

In Matthew, He is pre-eminently the Son of David, and King of the Jews, and His ministry is to that people. Matthew calls Him "the Son of David" eight times and it is as Son of David that He says, "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Is-' rael," Matt. 15:24. He must first offer Himself to God's chosen people, and this He does in person and through His disciples, Matt. 10:5, 6.

In Luke, He is the Seed of David, born of the Virgin Mary, and therefore a Saviour to all people. This is the line of Paul's ministry. After His complete recep­tion by the nation of Israel, Paul is called to pro­claim the grace of God without distinction to sinners, whether Jews or Gentiles, Rom. 3:22; Gal. 1:11. Paul never speaks of Christ as the Son of David because he is not presenting Him as the King; but ~efers to Him as the Seed of David, because he is proclaiming Him as the Saviour, Rom. 1:3; II Tim. 2:8.

But Paul also again and again proclaims the Deity of Christ arid preaches the necessity of His virgin birth. Strange that anyone would contend that Paul never taught the virgin birth, when his whole plan of redemption requires it and he implies it every­where.

IV. THE LAST ADAM.

                According to Paul's gospel, all mankind sinned in Adam, Rom. 5:13; I Cor. 15:22. Adam was the fed­eral head of the race and when he fell the whole race fell with him. Adam was also the natural head of the race and everyone descending from him by nat­ural generations has partaken of his sinful nature, Rom. 5:18, 19; Eph. 2:3, etc. Therefore, the apostle teaches that if we are ever to be saved there must come some one into our race that, while truly a man, has not descended by natural generation from Adam, and therefore has not inherited Adam's guilt and sin­ful nature. To be a substitute for us, He must be a real man; but to be an adequate substitute He must be "holy, harmless, undefiled and separate from sin­ners," Heb. 7:26.

How often does the apostle refer to our Lord in this aspect of His unique personality.

"The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam a quickening Spirit. The first man is of the earth, earthly; the second man is the Lord from heav­en," I Cor. 15:45-47.

Does not this teach Deity? How could He be Deity if He were the natural seed of Joseph?

"What the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and as an offering for sin, condemned sin in the flesh," etc., Rom. 8:3.

Does not this teach the pre-existence of Christ be­fore He came into this world? Does it not also teach that He did not inherit our sinful nature, since He did not have sinful flesh? How could this be if He were born like any other man with a human father?

"But when the fulness of time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law tQ redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons," Gal. 4:4, 5.

Here we have His pre-existence as the eternal Son and His sinlessness in His humanity; for how could He be sinless if He were an ordinary man like our­selves with a human father; or worse than that, ac­cording to the opposers of His virgin birth, the il­legitimate child of an impure woman?

"But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man," Heb. 2:9.

Here we see Him who was higher than the heavens, made lower than the angels, i.e., He became a man in order that He might die in our stead and save us, Heb. 2:16, 17; II Cor. 5:21.

Such Scriptures could be greatly multiplied. See Phil. 2:5-8; I Tim. 3:16; Rom. 1:3, etc, etc.

Three things are established by these Scriptures:

1. That Christ was God the Son from eternity, and apart from His birth of the virgin Mary.

2. That He was truly (a) man, without partaking of our sinful nature, and therefore without descending by natural generation from Adam.

3. That He must have these qualities in order to save us. If such is not the case, we Christians have no more of a Saviour than Budhists or Mohamme­dans; and all the millions of the saints that have died with the comforting assurance of being absent from the body and present with "the Lord that bought them," have been deceived.

Note 1: The word "sprema" is not, of course, the word used in the original Hebrew of Gen. 3:16 and Jer. 22:30; but it is the word used in the Septuagint (Greek) translation, and is the only word that gives the Greek meaning of the Hebrew word.

Note 2: After Jeconiah (or Jehoiachin) was <:arried to Babylon, Zedekiah, his uncle, was place on the throne by N ebuchadnezzar and reigned eleven years, but he was not in the true line of succession and all his children were slain, so he could have no successors. It is, therefore, correct to say that J econiah was the last king of Judah in the royal succession. From him the Jews dated their captivity, II Kings 24:17, 18; Ezek. 1:2; 33:21; Jer. 52:10.

The above article is reprinted from the King's Busi­ness, of August, 1924.-By permission. Reproduced from "Baptist Doctrine in a Nut Shell"   (These studies will continue)

This page is edited by Evangelist James A. Nelson,   jan23@cox.net

The Web Master is Pastor Martin R. Gutzmer,   mrgutzmer@gmail.com

The sponsor is David R. Pickett,   dr_pickett@hotmail.com